Balneus

Australian Lefty on Politics, Governance, Science and Info Management

Parliamentary dog chews on committees

Posted by Dave Bath on 2009-01-21


Either the Senate Standing Committee on Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts wants nothing to do with the new Senate Submissions application (which I initially reviewed here) because the committee knows it is an absolute dog and wants nothing to do with it, or that dog is ignorant of the existence of most committees, even the ones that have current inquiries!

I was trying to upload my submission to the soon-to-close ‘Saving the Goulburn and Murray Rivers’ bill.  The application first lets you select the relevant committee, and then you are supposed to select the relevant inquiry.

But the committee I wanted wasn’t on the list: the application only offered a short list of three!  Before you ask, yes, I did try scrolling up and down the drop-down, and no, you cannot proceed directly to an inquiry by name or topic.

So, let’s imagine a risk:

  1. A person wants to make a submission and knows the committee.
  2. That person goes to the Senate Submission System.
  3. Because the committee isn’t listed, and other committees don’t list the inquiry the person wants, that person assumes that submissions have closed, and does not make the submission.
  4. This implies that the new system could be seen as discouraging or preventing submissions, and that committees do not have access to the information they should have.

Senate submissions application 2009-01-21 showing that the Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts Committee, which has an open inquiry, is not on the list of available committees.

Senate submissions application available committees 2009-01-21

Click to enlarge the image of a partial screen-dump (2009-01-21) of the Senate Submissions System dropdown of available committees showing that the Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts Committee, which has an open inquiry, is not on the list of available committees.

Regular readers will have seen the gradual discovery of more and more flaws with Parliamentary webservers facing the public, and this is just another one.  You can bet it will be included in the second letter to APH webmasters which will be specific to the Senate Submissions System, on top of the one currently under development making more generic complaints (and on which I’m after eyeballs and sanity checking before I send it).

So, we have one or two (non-exclusive) options, both of which are damning, given the number of discovered flaws:

  1. The committee on Environment, Communications, Information Technology and the Arts knows about the flaws, and considers them so bad that the system should not be used for the work of that committee; and/or
  2. The committee doesn’t know of the flaws, but the system has been put into production before all appropriate static data is loaded.

As I’ve mentioned elsewhere, this is probably symtomatic, and I’m hoping that APH information systems get the resources (both money and expertise) from other agencies (most likely Tanner’s AGIMO) to make up for the patent lack of IT governance endemic to the Howard years.


See Also/Notes:

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Parliamentary dog chews on committees”

  1. […] "Parliamentary dog chews on committees" (2009-01-21) […]

  2. Substantial information right. I am long term to just for supplemental ideas on travel consumer electronics and wants any ideas. Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: